Proximal femoral nail for treatment of Unstable Trochanteric fractures, Review of Results in 60 cases
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction :To review the outcome of 60 patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for Unstable trochanteric fractures from Jan 2010 to Dec 2011. Methods: 27 men and 33 women aged 28 to 90 (mean, 63) years with Unstable trochanteric fractures underwent PFN fixation using an cephallo-medullary nail, a lag screw, and a hip pin & Interlocking Bolts. Fractures were classified according to the AO system; the most common fracture type was A3 (n=35), followed by A2 (n=25) with Left sided( 65%) Predominance. 15(25%) Fractures required to be openly reduced & fixed. All Fractures were satisfactorily Fixed using standard long or Short PFN depending on Fracture architecture & results were analysed. Average follow-up was for 15 months. Average Operating time was 90 min with average Blood Loss of 150 cc . Results: 90% of lag screws were optimally placed with well reduced fracture. 58(95%) united within average of 15 weeks(1218 weeks). Fractures in Males united slightly earlier than the Fractures In Females .2 cases had breakage of Implants & hence Non Union occurred. Average shortening was 2cms & No External Rotation Deformities were witnessed. 54 cases (90%) had good to Excellent results, 6 cases (10%) had poor results ,either Infection (3) , Breakage of Implants (2) & 1 had gap Nonunion. Conclusion: PFN is an useful & reliable Implant for the treatment of Unstable trochanteric Fractures at any age
منابع مشابه
Type II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw(DHS)
Background: Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common fractures of the hip especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low-energy trauma like simple falls. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is still considered the gold standard for treating intertrochanteric fractures by many. Not many studies compare the DHS with Proximal femoral nail (PFN), in Type II intertrochanteri...
متن کاملTreatment of Unstable Trochanteric Femur Fractures: Proximal Femur Nail Versus Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate.
Unstable trochanteric femur fractures are common fractures that are difficult to manage. We conducted a prospective study to compare functional outcomes and complications of 2 different implant designs, proximal femur nail (PFN) and proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP), used in internal fixation of unstable trochanteric femur fractures. On hospital admission, 48 patients with unstab...
متن کاملProximal femoral nail for treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.
PURPOSE To report outcomes of 87 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for trochanteric femoral fractures. METHODS 17 men and 70 women aged 58 to 95 (mean, 85) years with trochanteric femoral fractures underwent PFN fixation using an intramedullary nail, a lag screw, and a hip pin. Fractures were classified according to the AO system; the most common fracture type wa...
متن کاملAugmentation of proximal femoral nail in unstable trochanteric fractures
INTRODUCTION Biomechanically proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a better choice of implant, still it is associated with screw breakage, cut out of screw through femoral head, Z effect, reverse Z effect, and lateral migration of screws. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of augmented PFN in terms of prevention of postoperative complications and failure rates in unstable trochanteri...
متن کاملComparison of the Sliding and Femoral Head Rotation among Three Different Femoral Head Fixation Devices for Trochanteric Fractures
BACKGROUND Recently, various femoral head fixation devices (HFDs) for trochanteric fractures have become available. However, there are some cases in which femoral head rotation with excessive sliding of the HFD is observed and it is often followed by cutout. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of the three types of HFDs to prevent femoral head rotation. METHODS Between July 20...
متن کامل